Who is to define what?
yesterday, my friend asked me something. "Is there really a person out there with zero motives for what's done for others?" take note of the word 'zero' used in the sentence, and i felt probably its never the case. for one who lives this world, we are already pretty much borned to be selfish in nature. and to really have sub-zero motives for everything that we had done. i doubt anyone here will be brave or should i say, qualified enough to say, "Yes, i am one."
so my friend asked again, "Are only those born with lower IQs naive enough not to be schemeful towards humans and stuff?" i won't want to be stereotyping them here, but i felt high chance that they will be pretty skeptical about having undesirable plots in their minds. they live in a more simple life, happy-go-lucky is probably their only thought in mind towards each brand new day.
had some thoughts about it, and i feel that its pretty much impossible to expect how one will behaves, how sincere one really is. and then again, who is to say who and what is right or wrong? sometimes we just have to live the way it is and forget about stressing yourself with "Is he up to no good?", "Am i being used?".
i think i'll leave the rest for you guys to ponder about. i realised i hardly practice what i preached. guess i'll have to be less critical too.
till then.
Sunday, June 12, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments :
Post a Comment